Research on Wind Energy Data Quality Control Methods in Qinghai Province on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (2019–2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/30mfjf97Keywords:
Multi-source Fusion, quality control, wind energy resource, Qinghai ProvinceAbstract
This paper presents the construction methodology and quality assessment results of the “Qinghai-Xizang Plateau Multi-source Integrated Wind Energy Basic Dataset (V1.0)”. Addressing the challenges in wind energy resource assessment over the complex terrain of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, this study establishes a comprehensive data quality control system. The dataset spans from 2019 to 2021 and integrates observations from 12 meteorological towers and 53 national-level weather stations across Qinghai Province, along with multi-source fused analysis products at a spatial resolution of 5 kilometers. A tiered quality control process is applied, including range checks, temporal consistency checks, and vertical consistency checks. Additionally, dynamic threshold adjustment rules are designed based on historical climate extremes, and a multi-factor correlation logic incorporating temperature-humidity coupling is introduced, leading to an innovative algorithm for wind tower data quality control that significantly improves data quality in high-altitude regions of Qinghai Province. Assessment results show that the overall accuracy of the data after quality control reaches 93.28%, substantially higher than the national average. This dataset provides solid foundational support for wind energy resource evaluation, climate research, and low-carbon transition efforts in northwestern China, and demonstrates the effectiveness of multi-source data fusion techniques in enhancing the accuracy of meteorological observations in high-altitude areas.
Downloads
References
[1] Dörenkämper, M., Olsen, B. T., Witha, B., et al. (2020). The making of the New European Wind Atlas–part 2: Production and evaluation. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 1–37.
[2] Hahmann, A. N., Sile, T., Witha, B., et al. (2020). The making of the new European Wind Atlas, Part 1: model sensitivity. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, 1–33.
[3] Draxl, C., Clifton, A., Hodge, B. M., et al. (2015). The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit. Applied Energy, 151, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.072
[4] Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., et al. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
[5] Badger, J., Hahmann, A. N., Witha, B., et al. (2020). The New European Wind Atlas: Part 1—Model Sensitivity and Year Selection. Wind Energy Science, 5, 1251–1270. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-1251-2020
[6] National Energy Administration of China. (2018). NB/T 31147-2018 Technical code for wind energy resources measurement and assessment of wind farm engineering. China Water & Power Press.
[7] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2023). China Energy Statistics Yearbook 2023. China Statistics Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Applied Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










