A Multivariate Statistical Modeling Approach for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/48e98d21Keywords:
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Multivariate Statistical Models, Optimal Timing for Testing, Monte CarloAbstract
The accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is significantly influenced by the fetal fraction and maternal physiological indicators. This study aims to enhance the precision of fetal health assessment by constructing multivariate statistical and machine learning models to optimize clinical decision-making. First, to analyze the correlation between maternal factors and Y-chromosome concentration, One-way ANOVA and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression were employed; results indicated that gestational age and BMI are key predictors, with Random Forest Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) utilized to interpret non-linear relationships. Second, to address BMI-based stratification and timing, the Jenks Natural Breaks method was applied to divide BMI into eight groups, identifying an optimal testing window of 11–13 weeks, validated through Monte Carlo simulations to minimize detection risks. Third, a multi-factor optimization was achieved using an improved K-means clustering algorithm integrating height, weight, and age, which identified five refined BMI categories with an optimal testing point around 14 weeks. This model quantifies the contribution of technical errors through a weighted risk assessment. In conclusion, this integrated framework shifts NIPT from single-factor analysis to multi-dimensional optimization. Future work will incorporate multi-center data and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to predict dynamic trends in fetal DNA concentrations.
Downloads
References
[1] Van Beek D M, Straver R, Weiss M M, Boon E M J, Huijsdens-van Amsterdam K, Oudejans C B M, Reinders M J T, Sistermans E A. Comparing methods for fetal fraction determination and quality control of NIPT samples: Comparing fetal fraction and quality control tools for NIPT [J]. Prenatal Diagnosis, 2017, 37(8): 769~773.
[2] Hu L, Pei Y, Luo X, Wen L, Xiao H, Liu J, Wu L, Li G, Wei F. A multivariate modeling method for the prediction of low fetal fraction before noninvasive prenatal testing [J]. Science Progress, 2021, 104(4): 00368504211052359.
[3] Ding Y, Ni K, Fan X, Yan Q. A Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Optimization Model for Personalized Timing of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Based on Maternal BMI [J]. Mathematics, 2026, 14(3): 437.
[4] Yang M, Fu J, Yang Z. IEEE, 2025. Optimization Method for NIPT Timing in Pregnant Women Carrying Male Fetuses Based on Semi-Supervised Learning and Bayesian Model [C]//2025 5th International Conference on Digital Society and Intelligent Systems (DSInS), 2025Haikou, China: 47~55.
[5] Marton T, Erdélyi Z R, Takai M, Mészáros B, Supák D, Ács N, Kukor Z, Herold Z, Hargitai B, Valent S. Systematic Review of Accuracy Differences in NIPT Methods for Common Aneuploidy Screening [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(8): 2813.
[6] Teng Yuemei. Clustering Optimization and Random Forest Coupling Model for NIPT Clinical Decision-Making [J]. Technology of Smart IoT, 2026, 58(2): 145-149.
[7] Wang C, Hou D, Wang G, Wu X, Zhou Z, Yang L, Liu Y, Wang X. Progress, clinical application and challenges of non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic diseases [J]. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2026, 14: 1734842.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Applied Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










